By Kieran McCartan, PhD, David Prescott, LICSW,
& Alissa Ackerman, PhD
The bi-annual ANZATSA conference took place from the 28th
November – 1st December in Auckland, New Zealand. The conference was
a real mix of practice and research emphasising the role of prevention, risk
management, protective factors and an emphasis for an understanding of the
needs of aboriginal/traditional communities in working with perpetrators of
sexual harm. The conference was very international in nature with speakers and
attendees coming from New Zealand, Australia, pacific islands, Singapore, USA,
UK as well as The Netherlands.
The plenary sessions focused on the need to reframe sexual harm as being more than just a criminal justice issue, with speakers emphasising the need for a public health approach (Elizabeth Letourneau, Jill Levenson, Maia Christopher); how we reframe the socio-political debate (Maia Christopher); a need to think about the role of trauma and Adverse Childhood Experiences in the lives of perpetrators (Elizabeth Letourneau, Jill Levenson, Alissa Ackerman); how we need to build protective factors into the management and rehabilitation of perpetrators (Elizabeth Letourneau, Jill Levenson, Michiel de Vries Robbe); the need to listen to and re-evaluate our understanding of sexual harm in the context of traditional/aboriginal communities (Bryon Seiuli, Marlene Lauw, Pam Greer, Linda Waimarie Nikora) and the importance of how we listen to victims/survivors and incorporate their actual lived experiences into how we respond to sexual harm (Alissa Ackerman). The plenaries emphasised that we have reached a watershed moment in international and transitional conversations around sexual harm and that we need to reframe these issues more appropriately.
As we have said before, there are more things that unite our experiences
in the field of sexual harm than divides us. We just need to open our eyes,
ears, and hearts to learn and adapt from each other’s good (and bad) practice. One
tone that remained present throughout the ANSATZA conference was that anyone
and everyone with knowledge about sexual harm knows that current policies such
as registration, notification, and residence restrictions aren’t working in the
USA, arguing strongly that these should not be imported as is to other
countries internationally.
ANZATSA 2017 kicked off with a public engagement event prior to the
start of the conference, where the film “Untouchable” was screened. The
documentary screening was followed by a panel discussion with Jill Levenson,
Alissa Ackerman, Mark Hutton and Marlene Lauw. It was developed and lead by
Gwenda Willis as well as her colleagues in the “Advancing Sexual Abuse
Prevention”. The event was a great success with members of the public mixing
with attendees at ANZATSA and really emphasising the importance of informed and
constructive sexual harm policies; therefore, reinforcing and emphasising the
main themes of the conference.
Many of the conference breakout sessions and workshops this year seemed
to emphasis treatment, risk assessment and risk management. The conference had presentations on the
management of individuals who have committed sexual harm, registration and
monitoring (Shephard; Hutton, Laws, Derby & Ross), female sexual abusers
(Darling), understanding the sexual abuser as the service user (McCartan,
Prescott & Harris), desistence (Harris), protective factors (Dickson &
Willis), risk assessment (Helmus), adolescents who sexually harm (Lambie
&Tolcher; Kelly, Shumack & Evans; Tolliday; Firmin; de Larcerda
Mottin), perpetrators from aboriginal/traditional communities (Tofaeono;
Jamisetty, Tamatea & Boer), and the role, as well as impact, of pornography (Pratt & Hollis;
Fernandes; Prescott) to name a few.
Additionally, several sessions focused on the needs of survivors of
sexual violence, including the need for trauma informed approaches to working
with clients. This was an exciting aspect of the conference, as presenters
represented multiple countries, including New Zealand, Australia, South Africa,
and the United States.
Of course, the conference location (New Zealand) ensured that there
would be an emphasis on the assessment and treatment of indigenous people. One
can read about this in books, but there is nothing like the actual dialog of a
conference setting. Conference Co-Chair Armon Tamatea, for example, made a
number of excellent points as he examined the process of risk assessment both
inside and outside the cultural space of Maori life. These ranged from the use
of diagnoses developed well outside of Maori culture to the pathologizing
aspects for indigenous peoples of considering risk in isolation from protective
factors and the cultural context of community and family.
The primary take-away from these experiences for all of us is the
importance of redefining the field of sexual harm to being an inclusive,
multidisciplinary arena that talks across the reality of sexual abuse and
allows us to share good practice and learn from each other. What became
apparent is that we all agree that we need to change the narrative as well as
perception around sexual harm and that now, with all the issues being addressed
in society, is the time to start doing this collectively. Of course, a truly
multidisciplinary approach starts with each of us being able to collaborate
with one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment