By Kieran McCartan, PhD
Recently, I was asked to speak at a research event at my university
on the challenges of ethical research with high risk populations. At first I thought
that this was going to be an easy presentation because all researchers should
be on the same ethical and moral page, but I soon realized that there is a lot of
different notions of good research vs. good enough research and the related
research governance, in general, never mind with “high risk populations”.
All research presents ethical issues and dilemmas which mean
that the researcher should be a reflexive and considerate person. A researcher
should be thinking about the consequences of their research on the research population,
related organization's/institutions and their research organization (i.e., in my
instance a university, but it does not always need to be); but, this is not
always the case for sometimes see that a researchers allegiance can be to their
findings and publications. This is not to say that researcher’s should not be
mindful of their findings and the dissemination and impact of those findings;
but, rather that they should be committed and mindful of the whole process not
just the end point. A reflexive and considerate researcher is a good researcher.
Being a good, creditable researcher is essential when dealing with high risk,
risky or vulnerable populations. I recognize that these terms (high risk, risky
or vulnerable) are sweeping generalized terms, loaded terms and intertwined terms,
quite often someone who is risky is also vulnerable, someone who is a perpetrator
is also a victim, etc. The populations that we research with (people who have
committed sexual abuse, victims of sexual abuse and those impacted by both)
present their challenges to us in terms of consent, confidentiality, anonymity,
disclosure, health and safety as well as researcher wellbeing (physically,
emotionally and psychologically). Therefore we need to start any research in
the field of sexual abuse from a place of reflection, consideration and
sensitivity.
I believe that there are four main components to any research
project that need to be in constant consideration, all of which become essential
when dealing with high risk/challenging populations;
- The
researcher: The researcher always needs
to consider their own physical, emotional and psychological wellbeing. Are they
supported throughout the research process? Does the researcher have the capacity
to access all the different the types of support they need? Can the researcher receive
physical support if necessarily in a confrontation, who can they discuss the
challenges of the research with and are they able to withdraw from the research
process if it becomes to challenging or difficult? Have they considered why
they are involved in the research and what that means for their own going
mental health? The person conducting the research is as central to the research
process as the questions being asked or the data collected, therefore we have
to make sure that they are supported throughout the process.
- The
person being researched: Quite often research participants can be boiled down
to numbers on an excel or SPSS spreadsheet, they can be dehumanized. Good
ethical research reinforces the humanity of participants. We need to make sure
that the understand the research process, the research questions, that they can
consent to the research (as well as understand what that consent means), that
they are not tricked, that they do not incriminate themselves or indirectly
cause harm to themselves (or others). This means that we need to consider their
vulnerabilities, capacity and degrees of “powerlessness” in the research
process. As researchers we need to make sure that research participants are
treated fairly and that the data that we obtain through them is fit for
purpose.
- The
various institutions and partners: As researchers we have a responsibility to
the institutions that we work for (maybe universities or research bodies, but
not always) and the institutions where we research (maybe prisons, probation/parole
offices, police stations, etc.) to research in an ethical fashion. We are
carrying the name and responsibility of these institutions with us. On one level
this means conducting all research ethically, getting the appropriate clearance,
responsible data sharing, agreeing confidentiality with host as well as partner
organization's and being honest about the data that you are collecting/storing/disseminating.
Remember that you are representing your institution, and your field of study,
and any unethical research practice not only reflects poorly on you, but them
too as well as other potential researchers in the future.
- The
research itself: When conducting research it is essential to make sure that all
the necessary rules, regulations and guidelines have been adhered to. Have you
got ethical clearance from your institution? Does the host institution or
organization need to give you approval (the police, probation, parole, prison,
charity, NGO, etc.)? Do you need external body ethical clearance (the NHS,
Department of Justice, etc.)? Do you have a safe and secure place to store your
data? Have you made it clear to participants what you are going to do with
their data? Do you have data sharing agreements with all necessary
organization's, institutions and collaborators? It’s essential that your
research is coherent, watertight, ethical and adheres to all aspects of
research coherence because if it’s not your findings can be jeopardized.
Researching challenging and high risk populations can, and
does, have rewards in that it can impact upon changes to policy and practice;
but, it should be done ethically, carefully and with a great deal of
reflection.
No comments:
Post a Comment