“If we in the
judiciary do not have the authority, indeed the responsibility, to right
fundamental wrongs left excused by a majority of the electorate, our whole
intricate constitutional system of checks and balances, as well as the oaths to
which we swore, prove to be nothing but shams.”
Sex
educator, Dr. Marty
Klein recently published
a blog titled, “Politics? I’m
Interested in Sex, not Politics.” His
thesis is that sex and politics are inextricably connected, and if you care
about rational public policies regarding the management of sexual behaviors, it
helps to have a stomach for politics.
There’s
a natural tension between complex social problems, public opinions, and laws –
perhaps that’s one definition of “politics.”
In a democracy, laws are frequently driven more by public opinion than
sound science or constitutional principles.
Some “sex offender” laws seem to be driven by fear,
anger, and misinformation,
and resemble moral
panic more than informed public policies.
When the lag-time
for scientific advances takes too long to engender best practices or influence
public policies, or when a compelling public interest can no longer justify
laws that breach the boundaries of constitutional safeguards, often the courts
step in. Beyond the illustrations that
Dr. Klein offers in his blog, there are many examples of laws that are (or
were) unwarranted, overreaching, or unreasonably intrusive, and the courts
intervened. Consider these “sexual
offenses” of yesteryear.
In
1967, SCOTUS struck down laws that banned both interracial marriage and interracial
sex (Loving v.
Virginia). Until 1965 it was
against the law in some US states for married couples to obtain prescription
birth control (Griswold
v. Connecticut). It took seven more
years for that right to be extended to unmarried individuals (Eisenstadt v. Baird). In 1962, sodomy was considered so offensive
that it was illegal in every US state, in some cases even between married
partners. Sodomy laws were reaffirmed by
SCOTUS in 1986 (Bowers
v. Hardwick), before finally being struck down in 2003 (Lawrence v. Texas). In 2008, the US Court of Appeals (Fifth
Circuit) decriminalized the sale of sex toys (binding
in three states). By 2015, 37 US
states had legalized same-sex marriage before SCOTUS determined that neither
race nor gender were material to the civil controls of marriage. Same-sex
marriage became legal in the US, ten years after Canada.
In
each of the cases above, before they were eventually overturned by the courts,
public opinion had at one time supported these laws. Some would argue that the courts stepped in
too soon – others, like Margaret
Sanger or Frank Kameny
might have said both the tide of public opinion and relief through the courts took
too long. History also reveals that even
when courts overturn antiquated laws, controversies remain, and there can still
be stubborn
pockets of social resistance, or widespread cultural repression
tenaciously anchored in historical roots.
Homosexual acts are illegal
in more than 70 countries, still actively
enforced, and in perhaps a dozen countries, punishable
by death. If not for a 2008 SCOTUS
ruling (Kennedy v.
Louisiana), some sex crimes in the US might still be subject to capital
punishment.
Sometimes,
social change makes laws obsolete, and they just fade away, but it is likely
that there are still
laws on the books criminalizing sexual behaviors (e.g., sodomy,
fornication, adultery), which today are unenforced, but leave historical records
of public efforts to control interpersonal sex.
Sexual violence will always be intolerable, but sexual
violations are a broad category of unacceptable sexual conduct.
Every
US state, and countries worldwide, struggle with civil controls of marriage and
age of consent. In the US
and Canada, citizens must generally be 18 to marry, but in Mississippi
parties must be 21. In several states,
with parental/judicial approval, kids under 18 can marry - as young as 13 or 14
in New Hampshire, and in five other states there is no minimum age. Much to the detriment of teenagers,
the age of consent for sex is a minefield - around the world. In the US and
Canada, the age of consent is 16-18, with a confusing matrix of exceptions
for age differences or factors related to penetration. In most of Europe,
it’s even more difficult to navigate age
of consent laws that generally range between 14 and 16. In China, Brazil, Japan, Mexico, and the
Philippines, the age of consent is 12-14.
Controlling
sex has been vexing civilization since prostitution was described as the world’s
oldest profession. While sex trafficking and child prostitution
is abhorrent throughout most of the world, tolerance for prostitution
around the world varies considerably.
Depending on one’s role in prostitution, penalties
in the US carry fines from as little as $100 to as much as $750,000, and
from 15 days in jail to 20 years in prison.
Prostitution is legal (regulated) in several counties in Nevada, and
some foreign
countries. Around the world, and
throughout the US, consensual sex, legal in one jurisdiction, can create a “sex
offender” in another.
There
is a long history of society’s efforts to control interpersonal sex through criminal laws, but now a proliferation
of civil laws have made it easier
than ever for one to become a “sex offender.”
With public angst about “sexual offenders,” the courts are playing a
pivotal role in trying to maintain balance between veritable public safety and
constitutional safeguards around civil regulations. Competing concerns cannot always be resolved
by the courts, but sound science can always help guide the process. It is noteworthy that numerous ATSA members
contributed to much of the research noted below, and/or helped to inform policymakers. Informed policymaking does not guarantee an
outcome of good public policies; but most assuredly, misguided public policies
are the product of misinformed policymaking.
A 2016
decision by the Washington
Supreme Court opens the state registry to public view, apparently even for
registered juveniles. Washington has
strong public-access-to-data laws, and in 2012, the Ninth Circuit ruled that
juveniles can be publicly identified on sex offender registries. Laws intended for adults have migrated into
the juvenile system, with counterproductive
outcomes. The registry has devastating
consequences
for juveniles. The registry’s “irreparable
harm to youth and their families” has been extensively
researched and articulately described in a 2013 report by the Human
Rights Watch.
There
is a growing
awareness and substantial
research that the sex offender registry is overreaching, ineffective,
fails communities,
and is counterproductive
for those in recovery. There are
numerous, ongoing court
challenges to the registry, particularly as it applies
to juveniles. In 2012 the
Supreme Court of Ohio struck down automatic lifetime registration of
juveniles, and in 2014 there was a similar ruling in Pennsylvania. As the
foundation
erodes for the 2003 SCOTUS decision (Smith v.
Doe) that upheld SORNA, it is likely that the courts will continue to reconsider
registration requirements.
Another
popular civil control for “sex offenders” is regulating where they can
live or go. While residence or zone
restrictions have historical appearances of banishment,
about half
the US states have statewide residency or zone restrictions. Research
is becoming conclusive: residency
laws are not only ineffective
but counterproductive.
The media is beginning to recognize the problems
with residence restrictions, and laws are continuously undergoing review
by the courts.
In
February, 2016 Congress passed International
Megan’s Law, which will make international travel for registered sex
offenders profoundly difficult, and requires US passports to identify citizens
with certain sexual offenses. The public
law was challenged
in Federal Court in California. ATSA
filed an affidavit supporting a motion
for preliminary injunction; the US Attorney’s Office opposed
the motion. In April, 2016, the motion
was denied as premature, but the lawsuit
continues.
Perhaps
the most onerous civil regulation that “sex offenders” are subject to is civil
commitment. There have been thousands of
lawsuits filed in US courts challenging
civil commitment laws. In 2015, two
separate federal courts found SVP programs to be unconstitutional: MSOP
in Minnesota, and SORTS
in Missouri. The state of Minnesota
appealed the District
Court ruling and Judge
Frank’s remedies to the Eighth Circuit.
In April, 2016, the US Court of Appeals in St. Louis heard oral
arguments. A decision from the
Eighth Circuit is expected in the summer of 2016, however further appeals are
expected.
What
do all these criminal and civil laws, past and present, have in common? Social controls around interpersonal sexual
behavior. The truth is, there has never
been a time in history when “sex” could be separated from “politics.” What does ATSA have to add to sex, politics,
laws, and the courts? More informed public
policies.
Jon Brandt, MSW, LICSW
Author’s note: The large number of links embedded in this blog are in lieu of a
long list of references, and intended to both provide empirical support for
assertions, and offer readers an easy opportunity for more information. Links to court cases are intended to inform
readers only about the nature of certain court cases. Links to research or articles are only a
sampling of the voluminous information available on the topics herein. I would also like to add that, beyond ATSA,
there are innumerable professionals, concerned citizens, and organizations,
which have contributed immeasurably to the common quest for informed social
policies, safer communities, and better lives. It takes a village. Comments or corrections welcomed.
No comments:
Post a Comment