By Adams, A., MEd, King-Hill, S., Ph.D., Russell, D., Pg Cert., & McCartan, K., Ph.D.
When exploring the influencing factors in relation to sibling
sexual behaviour and abuse (SSB/A), it is useful to consider the influence of
outside factors. One factor that has come to the fore in recent years is
pornography. Pornography
is sometimes seen as an aggravating factor of sexual abuse. Yet, the
conversation about pornography, sex, sexuality and sexual abuse is more complex
than simply viewing and then doing. There are other social, cultural,
personality, psychological, and behavioural considerations that impact the way
that pornography consumption impacts ideas and actions related to sex and sexuality;
these are often ignored or overlooked. This conversation is still in its infancy, but it is pertinent to
consider the role of pornography within the context of SSB/A. There appear to
be two broad aspects to pornography in this context: the influence of all types
of pornography on sexual behaviours between siblings and intra-familial
specific pornography (i.e. stepsister/stepbrother themed pornography).
SSB/A has long been and continues to be a prominent issue in frontline
practice. Pornography use by adults and adolescents are often very
different matters, with the latter being potentially harmful in ways that adult
exposure to pornography may not be. Within the
field of practice many services supporting children and young people (CYP)
displaying harmful sexual behaviour (HSB), including SSB/A, often reference the
prevalence of pornography use and exposure. Pornography
is a frequent area of focus within interventions – these interventions often
seek to correct and address unhelpful and harmful messaging that has been
gained via the use of pornography as a source of sexual information and
knowledge.
The
influence of pornography appears to be embedded within wider societal systems
i.e. patriarchy/misogyny and relate to:
·
Men/boys more having power than women/girls
(e.g., are they permitted responsibilities and authority that girls are not).
·
Modelling violent gendered interactions.
·
The excusing and minimisation of boys
inappropriate and abusive behaviour because of their gender.
·
Lack of understanding of consent for boys.
·
Exposure to pornography from a young age is
rising in line with increased internet usage in CYP and plays into these
societal systems.
Pornography can skew the perspectives of consent,
engagement, and participation in sex and sexual pleasure. When considering this
in the context of SSB/A pornography may act as an influencing factor for
PSB/HSB onset. Pornography has been shown to heighten CYP’s contact with
unhealthy sexual scripts which endorse a lack of sexual consent and violence.
Pornography can also influence sexual expectations and attitudes towards women
and girls and can reinforce hetero-normative sexual relationships, as well as
harmful formations of masculinity such as male entitlement and dismissiveness
to the needs and wants of young women. While critical engagement with the harms
(including gendered harms) associated with pornography have been discussed in
relation to HSB enacted by non-related children there is much less discussion
surrounding pornography and SSB/A. The specific role pornography might have on
the onset of SSB/A is limited, but there is a small body of research evidence
to suggest that exposure to pornography bares an association with SSB/A. These studies (Latzman
et al., 2011; McDonald and Martinez,
2017; King-Hill et al., 2023; Zaniewski et al., 2022) found
that children who had sexually
harmed a sibling (primarily males) had being exposed to pornography within the
home, and pornography distorted their understanding of consent and exacerbated
their senses of entitlement and power.
Of course, most CYP will witness pornographic material and not
engage in HSB including SSB/A, and where SSB/A does occur pornography may not
always be evident as a behaviour engaged with. In addition, there is evidence
to suggest that CYP’s pornography use can have positive, not negative,
implications such as providing education to CYP about their bodies and sex (Goldstein, 2020). Nevertheless, CYP who frequently engage with pornography may be
more likely to internalise sexist messages and gendered power differentials
such as male sexual domination and female objectification and submission (Massey et al., 2021; Vera-Gray et al., 2021). It is reasonable to propose that CYP’s exposure to highly
sexualised imagery, coupled with their proximity and access to a sibling, could
heighten the risk of SSB/A. This is not
to suggest that pornography exposure causes SSB/A, nor that sexual
gratification is the sole reason for SSB/A. Instead, it is to emphasise that
pornography can diminish bodily boundaries and perpetuates a normalisation of
extreme, sexist, and intrusive sexual practices, and if CYP are regularly
exposed to these sexual scripts, and this is combined with other issues such as
parental absence and a sexualised home environment, problematic and abusive SSB
may be more likely to occur.
A second consideration in relation to SSB/A and pornography
consumption is that of ‘sibling-based’ pornographic material (i.e. pornographic
material which depicts a familial relationship such as step brother/sister). Pornographic material depicting sex between step-siblings (while these
actors are not actual siblings they act as if they are) is commonly available
on the main porn streaming websites and explicitly apparent on some social
media platforms. For example, one mainstream
pornography site hosts ‘channels’ which are collections of pornographic videos
produced by production companies or studios. There is a function whereby the
user can search and select these channels based on their ranked popularity,
(no.1) being the most popular (i.e. most subscribers and views). Examining this
list of channels shows that ‘family-based’ pornographic material is featured
regularly. Of the top 30 ranked channels 10 are dedicated to family-based
pornographic content, three of which are dedicated to pornographic material
which depicts a step-sibling relationship. While there is no research which
demonstrates an association between ‘sibling-based’ pornography and SSB/A.
There is a meaningful body of research that highlights that CYP can mimic and
act out what they see in pornography. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest,
that ‘sibling-based’ pornography could manifest a normalisation and acceptance
of incestuous sibling relationships and be internalised into CYP’s sexual
scripts.
The challenge of understanding the role of pornography in SSB/A, as
with any form of sexual abuse, is disentangling it for the inter-related social,
psychological, and behavioural factors. In terms of professional practice this highlights the importance of focusing on CYP’s wider sexual
knowledge and interests that may have contributed to their HSB occurring, as
well as supporting CYP to understand the content they may have been
unintentionally exposed to while exploring their sexuality and sex; exploration
that may have been influenced by a lack of developmentally required relationships,
sex and health education. In addition, we have to
be careful that we are not equating correlation with causation between SSB/A
abuse and pornography viewing. What we need to understand better is how this
material is viewed by CYP who engage and do not engage with HSB’s and what the
different triggers are in the SSB/A experience. We also need to understand the
role and impact of sibling related pornography in relation to the volume and
scale of SSB/A. All of this means we need more research, more education, and
more frank, but challenging conversations with the pornography industry, CYP,
and adults.
Note to readers on terminology: Language in this area has has been part of an important
discussion of late. In our work over the past four years focussing on this
issue we have seen many instances and examples of the behaviour between
siblings being clearly sexual abuse and sexually abusive. However, there are
also key examples where this is not the case and that the issues present as
sexually inappropriate and/or sexually problematic. This is an important
distinction, and with this in mind, for this blog, we will use ‘sibling sexual
behaviour and abuse’ (SSB/A). We would also like to acknowledge that
terminology in this space always evolves and that SSB/A is not a static term
and is likely to change as we begin to understand more about this issue.
If you are a young person
worried about your own or others’ sexual behaviour you can anonymously
contact Shore for support.
If you are an adult concerned
about your own or others’ sexual behaviours you can contact the Stop
it Now Helpline for confidential support.
If you are based in the USA and want support please contact - (1) What's OK https://www.whatsok.org, (2) Stop it Now! https://www.stopitnow.org/about-us/get-involved?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw7ZO0BhDYARIsAFttkCjbg75p5PN0hUEtF12zQ_ATtbPOVQjg4RSYDnE0_B4-xCQ792hp2UsaAg2OEALw_wcB
No comments:
Post a Comment